Depression and Optimism

George W. Bush once famously said:

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me… errr… twice…. errr.. umm…..

He was great, wasn’t he? I suppose the irony of that statement was that there are probably very few people in the world that you could fool more times than George W. Bush.

Just over a year ago I wrote a post called Economic Bloodletting in which I made a comparison between the government’s economic policy and the ancient medical practice of bloodletting, where doctors would try to cure an illness with a treatment that made the patient worse. Each time the patient had a a few glugs of blood removed their condition would deteriorate and in response the doctors would prescribe more bloodletting.

Fortunately our health service has moved on a lot since those days but what of the other side of that comparison? How has the government’s austerity policy served us over the twelve months since I wrote that? Do I have egg all over my face now? Have I been shown to be a scaremongering charlatan?

Let’s find out by updating the Depression Tacker!

Depression Tracker

Depression Tracker

For those of your unfamiliar with the Depression Tracker – I am comparing the current UK depression with the one from the Great Depression of the 1930s (until recently the benchmark for economic catastrophes). What’s worth noting is the position of the blue diamond on the graph. That’s when David Cameron came to power. You can see that at that time, the UK economy was doing much better than the equivalent period in the Great Depression, having never sunk as far and having been in recovery for the previous 12 months. After that point you can see that the recovery ground to a halt and in comparison, the economy during the Great Depression caught us up, passed us and kept on going. Five years after the economic collapse that started the Great Depression, the UK economy had not only recovered but was 4% larger than it was before the depression started. In comparison, our economy today is still 3.2% smaller than it was five years ago.

Now that’s a pretty stark difference and it’s not like I’m comparing things with a small economic hiccup – that green line is The Great Depression.

So what did the government do back in the 1930s to achieve the recovery? Yep – government spending. The government built a load of houses, employing a huge number of otherwise unemployed workers in order to do so. With the prospect of war on the horizon they increased military spending and built tanks and guns and planes and things. What they spent money on back then is not really important to the comparison, (I’m not suggesting we start a world war to end the depression). The important thing was the government spent money and when the government spends money in a depression they will get an extremely good return on it in terms of economic growth.

Since I wrote that post on Economic Bloodletting though, our current day government has done the opposite. They have continued to maintain their belief that decreasing spending during a depression will somehow magic up lots of growth. As you can see in the Depression Tracker above that has not happened and all they have actually achieved is the setting of a new benchmark to replace the Great Depression as the darkest point in our economic history.

Last week the ONS released its quarterly report showing that the economy is shrinking again. As I’ve said before, the results of one individual quarter is not the story here. The story is the longer term picture and when we look at that we can see that our economy has basically flatlined since the current government took office almost three years ago.

If the subject matter that I am discussing were something of a trivial nature then I would now be happily strutting around and saying, “I told you so!” but this subject is anything other than trivial. This failed experiment has meant a million people sitting at home waiting for work when there were no jobs for them. It has meant businesses going bust that could have otherwise continued and thrived. It has meant hundreds of thousands of students graduating into an economy that has no use for them. When you look at it like that you can understand why I would rather have been wrong.

Yet, I said in the title of this post there was optimism too and for the first time in years I do feel some. This is why:

One of these days, and probably sooner than you think, those people who stuck by the government when they said austerity would mean growth are going to run out of patience. Nick Clegg and Boris Johnson have both made comments in the last week to say that we need more government spending to get a recovery. They didn’t seem to want to expand too much on why they had been directly opposing it until last week but I have a theory on that – rats leaving a sinking ship.

Despite weak opposition, those who previously believed that austerity would create growth will not believe it for much longer and when this happens the government will have no choice but to do something sensible instead. Every quarter since the government came to power they have expressed solemn disappointment at the latest set of weak growth figures and sagely told us that more bloodletting is needed to cure the economy. The reason I’m optimistic is simply that I can’t see that there is any way people will continue to swallow it.

Fool me once? Fool me twice? Fool me thrice?

Seriously – even George W. Bush would have worked it out by now.

RedEaredRabbit

Advertisements

About RedEaredRabbit
My name is RedEaredRabbit, King of Kings. Look on my works ye Mighty and despair.

6 Responses to Depression and Optimism

  1. So I basically agree, and I love your blog (have been reading the backlog with glee) but for the sake of argument, I’ll be devil’s advocate a little:

    Surely DC’s tenure began with troughs of the Eurozone crisis? The UK doesn’t exist in a vacuum, it’s impossible to say whether austerity might have worked, all major trading nations being stable and hunky-dory.

    [Because as we know, in the 30s America, France and Germany were all doing the kind of big spending you advocate. Plus we had a humassive empire to plunder.]

    Many kudos, J

    • You are not wrong in your point. If the rest of the world had all pursued good economic policies and it had just been us that did the daft thing then things would not have been as bad and we might have got away with it a bit better.

      The Eurozone also plumped for austerity though and the US while it didn’t, still didn’t do a fiscal stimulus of anything like the required size. So yes, if we had been the only ones then things wouldn’t have been so bad but with most developed countries unwilling or unable to do the sensible thing we all screw each other up as well as ourselves.

      It’s worth noting though that many of the Eurozone countries had austerity forced upon them rather than choosing it and additionally it is worth noting that the US had its hands tied because to do anything they need the support of the Republicans and they are basically insane.

      We didn’t have either of those problems here. We have just made bad choices when we could have made good ones.

  2. I guess you were listening to the “Austerity hasn’t happened” – “It doesn’t work anyway” discussion on Today this morning?
    my populist thoughts on where the spend money could come from – http://www.smileofthedecade.co.uk/newblog/?p=746

    • No, I missed it. My radio alarm clock has broken so I haven’t heard Today for a couple of weeks. I expect that Jonathan Portes got it right though.

  3. chris says:

    Great read, thanks. I have only passing knowledge of the subject (I’ll read the culture, sports and science sections first!) but you managed to inform without dumbing down….which makes an averagely intelligent reader ‘feel’ dumb. And I find that’s a problem with a lot of economic journalism. It’s either opaque and require/expects foreknowledge or it’s patronizing. Anyway, i’m not adding anything to the conversation…. i just wanted to say thanks for a well written informative piece.

    • Thanks, Chris. I think the problems you highlight with a lot of economics coverage are what turn a lot of people off the subject. Trying to fill the gap was the primary reason I started the blog so very nice to have that feedback.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: